Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 26.06.2025 04:11

Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
What’s next?
Samsung teases Galaxy Z Fold 7 with an absolutely bizarre ‘Ultra experience’ [Video] - 9to5Google
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
South Africa’s emotional WTC triumph: Proteas win first major cricket trophy in 27 years - AP News
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Thank you.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
The Highest Prices You Can Get For Pokémon TCG's Destined Rivals - Kotaku
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
* Underwater Smoke Signals: Humpbacks May Be Talking to Humans - SciTechDaily
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
OpenAI signs surprise deal with Google Cloud despite fierce AI rivalry - Ars Technica
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.